Search for: "United States v. Ceballo" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), which holds that the First Amendment does not protect speech made pursuant to the employee's job duties.The case is Kiehle v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:22 pm by constitutional lawblogger
In its Orders today, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari to both Bowie v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Renner
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-7650, Bagu v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
However, van Heerden persisted in making public statements and testified in front of the Louisiana Legislature and the United States Congress. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm by Mike
He can't be sued, thanks to the great big forcefield the United States Supreme Court put around him. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
He stated that he had been working for the Renaissance Hotel until May 2008, but that he left that job after the hotel significantly cut back his hours. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
(pg. 14) **Note: The paragraphs above apply only to residential or condominium unit owner policies. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Tolentino v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:06 am by laborprof lpb
Although the United States Supreme Court expressly decided not to weigh in on the issue in Garcetti v. [read post]