Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 41 - 60
of 373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 1:08 pm
The petitioners in both City of Cincinnati v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm
City and County of San Francisco and Berger v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
City and County of San Francisco, California: The case revolves around a legal challenge to a federal immigration rule. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 12:41 pm
City and County of San Francisco West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 332, my April 5, 2019 post on which is found here), the Court rejected it as meritless. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm
City and County of San Francisco, California, a case the Supreme Court heard argument in earlier this week. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
(Citing Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
She became “of counsel” – a designation for lawyers who are neither associates nor partners – in the Washington office of Morrison & Foerster, a large San Francisco-based law firm. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967), DHS contends that the protection of children is an essential societal value and thus the interests it serves through home visits are more worthy of the public's concern than are Mother's interests in the protection of the sanctity of her home. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 4:07 pm
City and County of San Francisco to decide whether states with an interest in the dispute should be allowed to intervene to defend a rule when the United States is no longer doing so. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm
Aug. 20, 2019) (purchase of multiple properties in Wayne County, MI); United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:10 pm
City of San Francisco that if an employee is “a policymaker, then . . . his government employment could be terminated for purely political reasons without offending the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
City and County of San Francisco, the justices agreed to decide whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
City and County of San Francisco, California, 20-1775Issues: (1) Whether states with interests should be permitted to intervene to defend a rule when the United States ceases to defend; (2) whether the Department of Homeland Security’s final rule interpreting the statutory term “public charge” is contrary to law or arbitrary and capricious; and (3) whether the decision below as to the rule should be vacated as moot… [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
In several major cities and counties, in some territories, perhaps in the whole state of California, and to a small extent in Minnesota, private businesses may not discriminate against patrons based on certain of their political activities. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
