Search for: "United States v. Clemens"
Results 41 - 60
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Of possible tangential value to embassies and consulates is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia decision of September 19, 2007 in the matter Menachem Binyamin Zivitofsky et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
An exchange of notes that addresses many points of a future agreement between nations but is silent on certain aspects of the agreement cannot remove the unspoken matter from the realm of justiciable issues under the act of state and related doctrines, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in Eli Gross et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:48 pm
V(1)(e) of the Convention. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 3:05 pm
A victory in the United States District Court left Argentina with a loss of legal certainty. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am
Clemens Pottery Co. (1946) 328 U.S. 680, 692, and Lindow v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On June 22, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed in Hiwot Nemariam et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 10:11 pm
Simpson et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
United States Department of Defense, docket number 09-2375. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:38 pm
In the matter Ashraf-Hassan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
Lawyers at embassies in the United States may be surprised to discover that non-embassies can legally own domains like EmbassyOf....com. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:26 pm
In a 14 page opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed the District Court in the matter MBI Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
These cases were decided by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 USC §1602 et seq. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:56 pm
In the United States, they are governed by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:01 pm
In Bennett v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:01 pm
In Bennett v. [read post]
LXBN This Week Ep. 3: Facebook’s IPO, Oracle v. Google, POM’s “Juice Wars” and U.S. v. Roger Clemens
29 May 2012, 4:26 pm
And lastly we have the second go-around in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm
The 45-page opinion in Owens v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 4:10 pm
Refusing to appear in a civil court in the United States is an option but not an advisable one. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:38 am
The court explains that victims can receive assistance from the government to learn about additional assets a foreign government may own in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, partner, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington, DC.Note: The author's colleagues represent the defendant-appellant. [read post]
