Search for: "United States v. Commanding General"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am
Either side may propose a specific sentence; often the defense will decline to do so, arguing instead in general terms for leniency or simply arguing that the sentence proposed by the prosecution is too high. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
Paragraph 7 is amended as follows: The phrase “United States ground-based ballistic missile defense interceptors” is replaced by the phrase “a United States Ballistic Missile Defense System”. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:15 am
Perry, that the United States Supreme Court ruled constitutional. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Ratification advised by the Senate of the United States of America on May 27, 1970. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:33 pm
United States (1997) (and that lurked behind the decision in Medellin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
The full brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:32 am
United States, No. 10-158, has been distributed for the 29 October conference. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 10:56 am
" Fokker, 818 F.3d at 741 (alterations omitted); see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:00 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
” Findley’s belief that the second sentence made state-owned submerged lands “not a portion of the park,” prompted Alito to remark that “whether something can be within a unit but not be a portion of the unit is kind of a nice question. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:34 am
United States: cert-petition-1-1.pdf Question presented: The 2014 Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act states that, for income tax purposes, “[g]ross income does not include the value of any Indian general welfare benefit. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:34 am
United States: cert-petition-1-1.pdf Question presented: The 2014 Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act states that, for income tax purposes, “[g]ross income does not include the value of any Indian general welfare benefit. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:29 am
The United State Supreme Court disagreed, holding the plain language of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17–1618. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17–1618. [read post]
