Search for: "United States v. Commanding General"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Colorado isn’t even trying to prevent Colorado’s presidential electors from casting their electoral votes for Donald Trump if he wins the popular vote in Colorado in November, nor (as I’ve explained earlier) has it asserted any state law authority to exclude Trump from the Colorado general election ballot (something that Colorado law does not appear to authorize). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
What would their powers be over the commander of the military, but for the virtue of the commander? [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In 2002, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See John Randolph Tucker, General Amnesty, 126 N. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm
Paul Nakasone, four-star general and commander of the US Cyber Command, also wrote to Senator Wyden about the NSA’s practices with commercially available information (CAI). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
Itself a prolific issuer of guidance documents, the United States filed an amicus curiae brief in support of neither party. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
Naval Forces Central Command said. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Then, in Liapes v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:05 am
For example, in the Bosnia v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Central Command. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
" United States v. [read post]