Search for: "United States v. Commanding General" Results 41 - 60 of 2,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Colorado isn’t even trying to prevent Colorado’s presidential electors from casting their electoral votes for Donald Trump if he wins the popular vote in Colorado in November, nor (as I’ve explained earlier) has it asserted any state law authority to exclude Trump from the Colorado general election ballot (something that Colorado law does not appear to authorize). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
What would their powers be over the commander of the military, but for the virtue of the commander? [read post]
Paul Nakasone, four-star general and commander of the US Cyber Command, also wrote to Senator Wyden about the NSA’s practices with commercially available information (CAI). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Itself a prolific issuer of guidance documents, the United States filed an amicus curiae brief in support of neither party. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]