Search for: "United States v. Duran"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
United States, No. 05-5713 "Denial of petition for habeas relief, alleging that court-appointed counsel failed to timely petition for certiorari review is vacated and remanded where, construing the appeal as motion to recall the mandate, the motion is granted, the judgment vacated, and the matter is remanded in accordance with Wilkins v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
However, the First Amendment protects finger flipping, as confirmed earlier this year by the Western District of Pennsylvania: By 2006, numerous federal courts, including a United States District Court in Pennsylvania, had ruled that the middle finger gesture was constitutionally protected speech. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm
Review Granted Duran v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Duran v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am
In Duran v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
In Duran v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) Duran v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Villegas Duran v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Oct. 14, 2008) (reducing punitive damages award to comply with due process requirements of the United States Constitution); Anderson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:31 am
” Special Agent in Charge John V. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:17 am
United States Bank National Assn., 203 Cal. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
No such luck for Duran v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
” At Mirror of Justice, Kevin Walsh surveys commentators’ assessments of Thomas’ 25 years on the court, contending that Thomas “is one of the most under-appreciated Justices in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:22 pm
ItalyS.G. v. [read post]
