Search for: "United States v. Gray" Results 41 - 60 of 924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm by Larry
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm by Mark Graber
  Once a cultural shift in the United States occurred such that gays and lesbians were perceived as just like us, the equality argument was bound to succeed, not because equality arguments are particularly powerful, but because the cultural prerequisites for the equality argument were in place.Freddie Gray is not just like us. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 11:08 am by Crescent Cheng
United States Fish and Wildlife Service photo of gray wolf OR-7 According to the administrative record, gray wolves historically inhabited most of the United States, including much of California, until they were extirpated from California almost 100 years ago. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:25 am by Audrey Huang
  The United States District Court for the District of Montana struck down the 2009 Rule as violating the ESA because the ESA does not permit partial delisting of a distinct population segment. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:42 pm by Dwight Sullivan
When I crunched the Silver CAAF Tongue Award numbers, I overlooked the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, will argue for the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are… [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Gray Pope, Rutgers Law School, Newark, has posted Snubbed Landmark: How United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm by Sandi Zellmer
” Findley’s belief that the second sentence made state-owned submerged lands “not a portion of the park,” prompted Alito to remark that “whether something can be within a unit but not be a portion of the unit is kind of a nice question. [read post]