Search for: "United States v. Humble" Results 41 - 60 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Larry
The United States Department of Agriculture has the important obligation to protect American farms, orchards, forests, parks and backyards against the damage that can be caused by plant diseases and pests that enter the United States through our ports of entry. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:00 am
(Your humble scribes were on the scene to report on Rohde v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am by Steve Baird
Not every day does the United States Supreme Court weigh in on a topic impacting the trademark world, but it did so yesterday in Already, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Dennis Crouch
    On <Date>, United States Letters Patent No. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
UTR also lobbies for the following question to be posed to Judge Roberts: "How does it feel to be the fifth-hottest [male] federal judge in the United States? [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Jani
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]