Search for: "United States v. K" Results 41 - 60 of 3,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:46 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
On May 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of participants in a company sponsored 401(k) plan who claimed that the company violated its fiduciary duty with respect to certain mutual funds added to the plan. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
United States, 329 F.3d 751 (9th Cir. 2003), holding that § 162(k) precludes a deduction for Ralston Purina Co.'s payment to its ESOP in... [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Now Online at BrokeAndBroker.com:FULL-TEXT Second Circuit Opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The European Union shall notify the United States of America of the date of accession of new Member States. 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:08 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
K Visa Applicants Remain in Limbo Outside of the named plaintiffs in the case Milligan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:55 pm by Mary Kate Healy and Steve McBrady
United States, addressing jurisdiction over contractor claims under the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”). [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 8:29 pm by RHP
  In any given instance when canine force is used for criminal apprehension, there is the potential for a violation of the individual’s fourth amendment rights as specified in the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
D827,946 for a “Pet Grooming Glove,” a design that was allegedly already in circulation in the United States before the patent application. [read post]