Search for: "United States v. Levin"
Results 41 - 60
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2022, 8:20 am
Whether that involves testifying before Congress, speaking at Justice Department summits, or serving in the Administrative Conference of the United States, Professor Levin has defended and advanced a vision of the administrative state that promotes the rule of law, stability and fairness in administration, and effective governance. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The United Supreme Court on Wednesday, in a 6-3 ruling, held that a drug company is not protected from state law claims simply because the federal government approved the product and its labeling. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:52 am
As demonstrated at Geo units in Coke and Dickens Counties, the state already spends a lot of money to oversee its private contracts, and probably needs to spend more. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
Much has been said about the wide range of experiences that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson will bring to her new job on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
United States (12-1493) have been granted. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
Judge Solomon Olivier Jr. of the The United States District Court in Cleveland has just ruled that some claims against drug manufacturers are still pre-empted by FDA approval, despite the Supreme Court decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Levin College of Law) has posted From Downes v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, pending in United States District Court, Central District of California, Case No. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:53 pm
Approval of drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should not preempt any liability under state tort laws for pharmaceutical manufacturers, editors of the New England Journal of Medicine argue in a brief to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:11 pm
As to any remaining basis which defendants have presented in the instant matter, the United States Supreme Court has clearly concluded that Congress did not intend the preempt state-law failure-to-warn actions.Slip op., 2009 WL 635415, at *3. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 1:09 pm
District Court United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
In Levin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:12 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
The New England Journal of Medicine has filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court arguing that lawsuits against drug companies benefit the medical practice by getting information about harmful effects of drugs into the hands of both doctors and the public.The case is Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 2:53 pm
Kneedler, the Deputy Solicitor General representing the United States, concurred with Wyeth’s arguments. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:00 am
We posted Wyeth's principal brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
