Search for: "United States v. Local 560" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
 The Cultural Affairs Agency estimates that losses due to Chinese pirate sites alone have amounted to at least ¥560 billion in the past year. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
That's the part of the Bankruptcy Code that makes your phone stop ringing and lawsuits stop coming when you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arizona.It's a pretty complicated piece of legislation, and it's fundamentally different from the versions of stays which existed under the Bankruptcy Act (the version of the bankruptcy law that we had in the United States prior to what bankruptcy lawyers called the New Code prior to the 2005 Amendments. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) still apply for purposes of overbreadth claims under the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
And that value was as important for the Chinese, Russians, and second tier group of American-wary states, as it now appears to be to the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate the needed assistance. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The Petitioner (PACE Local 8-0369) sought to represent a unit of all operations and maintenance technicians at the Employer's Valdez Marine Terminal (VMT) facility, relying on the Board's longstanding presumption that a single-facility unit is appropriate for collective bargaining. [read post]