Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 41 - 60 of 1,509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am by CMS
’[12] The Court of Appeal have stated that ‘where children are affected the state is subject to an obligation to relieve poverty if “necessary to allow family life to continue. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Music and Copyright IPKat provides a summary of the three cases brought in the United States claiming that the song Thinking Out Loud performed by Ed Sheeran, copied Let’s Get It On performed by Marvin Gaye. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Kentucky was part of Virginia until 1792 when Virginia ceded the district of Kentucky to the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
It’s not for nothing that Lord Acton’s comment in his 1887 letter to Bishop Creighton was ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
Religious freedom in the EU: a US perspective The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has released an Issue Update: Religious Freedom Concerns in The European Union. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy International submitted a written response to Lord David Anderson’s call for comments relating to his review of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education replied: “My Lords, the UK is a proud signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:30 am by Christopher J. Robinette
Instead, Lahav insists that the doctrinal rule for producers of injurious products in the United States in the nineteenth century was negligence liability. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
It will then treat the two (or more) people as a unit and treat the unit differently from how it would treat those same people individually. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 27 June 2023 the House of Lords approved an amendment to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill which aims to tackle “strategic litigation against public participation” (“SLAPPs”); the use of defamation law to silence critics. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am by Josh Blackman
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]