Search for: "United States v. Luna"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a court can freeze a criminal defendant’s “untainted” assets when the defendant’s “tainted” assets have been spent or cannot be located. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
The final vote in Mullenix v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States, 15-5756, is a spin-off of last Term’s Johnson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Rochow v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:37 am
Background The petitioner, Jorge Luna Torres (who refers to himself as George Luna), is a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic and a lawful permanent resident of the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
United States, 14-10154, probably returns for a second time. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:11 pm
§§ 921(a)(33)(A) and 922(g)(9) are unconstitutional under the Second, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments and the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
United States 15-27Issue: Whether, to invoke a district court's jurisdiction under the Quiet Title Act to adjudicate the merits of a quiet title action, a state must establish facts that show affirmative action by the United States that demonstrates its claim to title in the property, or alternatively whether a state can rely on facts that raise a cloud on the state's title. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Adame v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
United States 14-510Issue: Whether the D.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
According to United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am
Luna; Nathan Montgomery; Adam Daskivich; David Murtha; St. [read post]
