Search for: "United States v. Ly" Results 41 - 60 of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:15 pm by Race to the Bottom
Collins, 409 F.Supp.3d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2019), former United States Representative Chris Collins (“Collins”), a New York Republican, plead guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and lying to federal investigators. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:02 am by admin
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:01 pm by Bill Otis
Alito wrote a concurring opinion arguing that the statute requires the government to prove only that the defendant knowingly sought to obtain money by means of a falsehood and not for any specific purpose.As I said in my entry last week on the defendant's loss in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Index Newspapers v City of Portland, 3:20-cv-1035-SI, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has entered a temporary restraining order that blocks federal law enforcement officers from arresting or using physical force against journalists and legal observers as they respond to anti–police brutality protests there. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:15 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Michelle Brauer Abidoye, United States: Fourth Circuit Joins Other Circuits And Takes A Narrow View Of The... [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an immigration case, Chief Justice John Roberts “took issue … with the Trump administration’s stance,” “saying it could make it too easy for the government to strip people of citizenship for lying about minor infractions. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:57 am
Co. v Graham, 275 AD2d 1012, 1013; see generally Thrasher v United States Liab. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm by Bexis
  Anyway, before we get off on more of a tangent, here's a copy of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
As the relevant regulation noted: (G) In the case of a communication appearing exclusively on a cable or satellite television system, but not on a broadcast station or network, that the viewership of the cable system or satellite system lying within a Congressional district or State is 50,000 or more; 11 CFR §100.29(b)(7)(i)(G). [read post]