Search for: "United States v. MacDonald" Results 41 - 60 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Niemela accepted Google could not comply with an order compelling it to block defamatory search results in the United States and would not enforce a foreign judgment which would violate free speech rights [33]. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
For many years now, the prevailing case on injunctions in Canada has been the Supreme Court’s decision in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:00 am by Bradley Schneider and Marnie Lusis
Judicial consideration of sandbagging Unlike express sandbagging provisions, which courts in both Canada and the United States will generally enforce, there is no clear answer in Canadian case law if sandbagging is, or is not, permitted when it is not directly addressed in the agreement. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
First, the compatibility of United Kingdom corporate taxation with certain principles of EU law and the liabilities of the Revenue to a taxpayer who has overpaid tax on the basis of incompatible United Kingdom legislation. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 15 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
 Case number: 11-cv-03386 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York)Case filed: July 14, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 19, 2014 9/24/2014 12/23/2014 2014-98 In the Matter of Keith MacDonald SummersAdministrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
He continued to claim that he was arguing with his girlfriend before he saw the officers, and stated that she was also the person he had called from the booking area. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am by UKSC Blog
MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 4 December 2019. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
Altman's vulnerable medical state and age meant that her chances for reemployment into a comparable position were very low, and justified an extended period of notice. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
MacDonald 12-1490Issue: Whether the Virginia courts unreasonably applied Lawrence v. [read post]