Search for: "United States v. Mak" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
United States rejects the need for heightened scrutiny. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case about whether property owners are entitled to a jury when the federal government takes their land,” arguing that “[a] jury is key when it comes to compensation questions because the government has an obvious conflict of interest in appraising ‘fair’ market value. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Washington state criminalizes (among other things) “mak[ing] an electronic communication to … a third party” “with intent to harass, … torment, or embarrass any other person” if the communication is made “[a]nonymously or repeatedly. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the account’s “bio” line, Trump identifies himself as the “45th President of the United States of America. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am by Jason Kaufman
Energy United States, LLC, that an employee who only reports a suspected violation internally is not a protected whistleblower for the purposes of Dodd-Frank’s anti-relation provision. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am by Jason Kaufman
Energy United States, LLC, that an employee who only reports a suspected violation internally is not a protected whistleblower for the purposes of Dodd-Frank’s anti-relation provision. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:00 am by John Duffy
Consistent with the territoriality principle, U.S. patents have long granted to patentees exclusive rights to control any “mak[ing]” of the patented invention within the territory of the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am by Joe Rich and Thomas Silverstein
In the face of deeply entrenched patterns of residential segregation and exclusion, Congress enacted the FHA in 1968 to effectuate “the policy of the United States to provide, within constitutional limitations, for fair housing throughout the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am by Terry Hart
United States, which decided that a federal statute that referred to “labor” only applied to manual labor and not “professional” services. [read post]