Search for: "United States v. Marin" Results 41 - 60 of 1,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  Following the statutory requirement to establish a “legitimate busiess interest” to enforce a non-compete agreement, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Autonation, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 8:23 am by John Zazulak
In a recent ruling from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in In re Aries Marine Corp.,[1] Judge Lance Africk found that a waiver of subrogation by a Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA) carrier did not waive the carrier’s right to an offset against future LHWCA liability. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
” However, entry to the United States under that statute is limited to two years. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Brian Finucane
The United States has responded to recent Iranian action by deploying F-16, F-35, and A-10 warplanes to the region, along with additional warships, and U.S. forces, including the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Edward Roggenkamp
On Friday, August 4, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment in favor of the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) in the case of Melone v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
The Constitution’s Appointments Clause makes clear that the President nominates “officers of the United States,” but this nomination is subject to the Advice and Consent of the Senate. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The United States has the world's largest prison population and one of the world's highest rates of imprisonment. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am by Garrett West
United States, 524 U.S. 125, 129 (1998); Japan Whaling Association v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am by Kalvis Golde
United States Bureau of Reclamation 22-1116Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder. [read post]