Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With Buildings"
Results 41 - 60
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
High Sierra Rural Alliance v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Thresholds of Significance Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
To understand how we got to Janus v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
Tuscola argued that it held leases to develop and use the parcels covered by its SLUP application, and therefore had an interest in the use and possession of real estate. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
For example, the Court stated: “The fulcrum this case turns on is the direct link between the government’s demand and a specific parcel of real property. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
The site was surrounded by developed residential and commercial parcels with fully improved infrastructure, and contained 25,000 square feet of vacant single-story buildings previously used by a car dealership. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
The tone of Hawkins’ argument was set three sentences into his presentation, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg interrupted to ask pointedly: “Is it not the case that no other political entity would be immune from such a quiet-title suit, not the United States, not a state of the United States, not a foreign government? [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
State and local regulations prevented the use or sale of adjacent lots as separate building sites unless they have at least one acre of land suitable for development. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
State and local regulations prevented the use or sale of adjacent lots as separate building sites unless they have at least one acre of land suitable for development. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:04 am
” “In late 2006, Ludlow, a real estate developer, retained Olshan, a law firm, to represent Ludlow with respect to the acquisition of air rights over a parcel of land owned by Ithilien Realty Corp (Ithilien) that adjoined the property that Ludlow owned and was developing as a hotel at 180-184 Ludlow Street, on the Lower East Side of Manhattan (Project). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm
There are, however, two important caveats to this general rule: 1 – In nearly all cases, real property located in the United States in not like-kind to property located outside the United States. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The commercial parcel is a 1.4-acre lot fronting S.R. 46 that the appellant planned to build a commercial structure on. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:44 pm
Building to building? [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
Aptos Council v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Without more details or some facts from the BIA or the other side of the transaction, one could conclude that Small is a real estate opportunist. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
In Murray v. [read post]
