Search for: "United States v. Paramount Pictures"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
Instead, ´what is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer’ (following Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) and Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 113-14 (2d Cir 1998). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Figure 2: The Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, the Conservation Service Unit at issue in Sturgeon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm
When faith leads to social action, however, otherwise impossible results can include the election of Blacks to local, state, and federal office, with the most significant being the election and reelection of Barack Obama, the first Black president of the United States of America. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
United States that the evacuation order was legal. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
In 2011, the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considered an employee’s appeal following his termination for FMLA misuse. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:08 pm
Paramount Pictures, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
Federal and state laws require similar elements to prove misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
(3) An examination of whether notorious foreign infringers have attempted to or succeeded in accessing capital markets in the United States for funding or public offerings [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am
Pant advised the State to stop taking criticism of governance as a personal insult. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
[In a phone call], Elder Van Donselaar stated, "Edouard is more repentant than any of the women will ever be. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Introduction Cuba has been facing increasingly challenging economic problems since the fall of the Soviet Union[1] and the end of the Soviet system of state-to-state based economic activity.[2] In the absence of Soviet aid, and in the face of U.S. political and economic hostility,[3] Cuba has sought new partners and allies.[4] Cuba also has increasingly experimented with innovative ways of organizing economic activity that avoid reducing the paramount power of the… [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:06 am
In April 1994, in the now-famous congressional hearings before the United States House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Big Tobacco executives asserted yet again that the causal relationship of smoking and cancer had not been proven: the CEOs of ... [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not qualify… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
