Search for: "United States v. Parris"
Results 41 - 60
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Parry would be entitled may be, under Federal court decisions, a matter dependent upon the resolution of the state court matrimonial action. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Parry would be entitled may be, under Federal court decisions, a matter dependent upon the resolution of the state court matrimonial action. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:21 am
Constitutional clauses and articles thrusted and parried. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:48 pm
And just to be clear, "in China," for purposes of China's trademark law, does not mean in Hong Kong or in Taiwan or in Macau or in the United States or in Australia or in any other country. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Class 46) United States US General Can the ITC keep pace? [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Judge Walton, Sullivan says, also never found that the petitioner raised a finger against the United States or its allies. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm
Holder (Supreme Court)The Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) moves some foreign works that had been in the public domain in the United States into copyright, by extending the copyright on the titles retroactively. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
(IPKat) Amending goods and services specifications: new UK guidance (Class 46) United States US Patent Reform US patent law reform – Swearing-Back: Dealing with colliding filings under HR 1249 (Canada Patent Blog) Manager’s Amendment for H.R. 1249 (Inventive Step) Manager’s amendment for H.R. 1249 – House reverts to Senate inter partes review standard (Patents Post Grant Blog) Fixing the ‘first inventor to file’ one-year grace-period provision of… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in a case further exploring the contours of the Miranda warning, J.D.B. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
