Search for: "United States v. Pink" Results 41 - 60 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm by Afro Leo
  A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here  in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
He told Phillips that he wasn’t convinced that the court’s 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
The soon-to-be-released independent film Little Pink House dramatizes the story behind Kelo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:10 am by Amy Howe
Although the 2nd Circuit relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
INS: speech the state can’t regulate—how far are we from having no distinction b/t commercial and noncommercial speech? [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm by familoo
So, childrens' rights are significantly embedded in the family and difficult to separate from them (See The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51 (28 July 2016) for an example of this in action, which Allan Norman wrote about on Pink Tape here). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
ABC News v Beef Products Inc, “The Pink Slime case” (United States) ABC News and Beef Products Inc. reached a $177m million settlement after the news outlets report in 2012 that the food production company made low-cost processed beef that equated to “pink slime”. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am by Scott R. Anderson
The most notable example of this practice is the Supreme Court’s own 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
Redish is right, don’t fit Sheriff Joe for his orange jumpsuit (and Arpaio’s signature pink underwear) just yet. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:28 am by Eugene Volokh
“DISH Network contracts with thousands of third-party retailers in the United States who solicit sales as authorized dealers. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
This expansive language would likely chill a wide range of political activity in the United States directed at the Israeli government — activity that is constitutionally protected, regardless whether members of Congress agree with it. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
United States A Derry priest has been granted permission to sue an American Catholic Diocese for defamation. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump’s legal team wants a defamation claim that was filed against the President by a former contestant on reality show the Apprentice to be dismissed on the grounds that it is politically motivated. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2017 the Culture Secretary Karen Bradley made a statement to the House of Commons stating that she was “minded” to refer the proposed takeover of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox Inc to the Competition and Markets Authority on plurality grounds. [read post]