Search for: "United States v. Plaster"
Results 41 - 45
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
Nor does it preclude the possibility that specialised units would be more effective. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
In Talley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm
Nor does it preclude the possibility that specialised units would be more effective. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
A low-cost alternative, if it materializes, may tempt smaller activists—perhaps including better-funded versions of the “issues” activists now plastering corporate boardrooms with various 14a-8 stockholder proposals—to nominate one or two directors to press their concerns in the boardroom.[1] However, Rule 14a-19 does not address the longstanding question of just what information the nominating stockholder should disclose to voting stockholders. [read post]
