Search for: "United States v. Pretty Products, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
Unfortunately, the good guys lost the broader express preemption arguments almost twenty years ago in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
There is no evidence that the Ortho Evra® patches which [plaintiff] received differed from either the manufacturing specifications for that product or from other identical units. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 5:14 pm
Home Products International, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
They do not extend to infringement occurring solely outside of the United States, even if consumer confusion occurs in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), the most on-point United States Supreme Court decision in the area. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:34 pm
United States, which is a drawback case. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:00 pm
(Ilya Somin) I tend to agree with Eugene that today’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 [4] CCA & B, LLC., v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Shire US, Inc., 415 F. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
This is the first time that any decision from outside the United States has ever appeared on our year-end best/worst lists. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Reminiscent of Hana Financial Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
United Dominion Industries, Inc., 473 F.3d 532, 538 (3d Cir. 2007).There's no comparative fault in strict liability that would reduce a verdict where the plaintiff did something stupid. [read post]
