Search for: "United States v. Quarterman" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 4:11 am
Second, Panetti's reasoning quietly erodes the rationale for the continued use of the death penalty in the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
Chapleau, 62 F.3d 167 (6th Cir.1995), that competency determinations are mixed questions of law and fact, it concluded that the subsequent United States Supreme Court holding in Thompson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70004 Denial of an application for a certificate of appealability following denial of habeas relief is affirmed in part, but reversed in part where, in light of the recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
United States Issue: Whether, under the Due Process Clause, a defendant who pleads guilty retains the right to appeal a pre-trial competency determination. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in 8 cases this morning. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Quarterman Questions Presented (certiorari limited to first question) Opinion below __________________ [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]