Search for: "United States v. Raven"
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
United States, a "closely watched federal tax case involving the scope of the work-product doctrine. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
Code §7231, Raven’s Cove v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:15 am
Jerry reveals: “The sexual harassment laws, of the United States at least, are purposely designed to protect employees and do not extend to independent contractors. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 5:42 pm
., Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:00 am
(IP Thinktank); 3M reaches global settlement over lithium battery patents with Sanyo (IP Law 360),ACTA - The United States, European Union and other key trading partners on Tuesday announced their intention to negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) to encourage other countries to meet higher intellectual property rights enforcement standards: (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Law Daily), Pharmaceutical Lifecycle Management and IP Acquisitions: (IP… [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:24 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Raven Belt v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:30 am
Per United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 10:25 pm
Raven, 39 F.3d 428, 434-35 (3d Cir.1994) (the defendant bears only a burden of production regarding intent and capability); United States v. [read post]
