Search for: "United States v. Reading Co"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc.… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Read the National Union of Journalists summary here. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
In this regard, precedent from the United States Supreme Court, in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
United States patents are generally territorial. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
United States, 579 U.S. 162, 170 (2016). [3] Oral Arg. at 00:21–00:54, Sumitomo Pharma Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
On January 25, 2013, at the first reading, the law was approved by 388 votes (with one vote against and one abstention). [18] On June 11, 2013, the State Duma approved the law at the second and third readings prohibiting “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations among minors. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 4:27 am
Treme v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:49 am
§ 30501, et seq. [2] Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am
Carême v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
• ParticipantsThe following may send representatives, without the right to vote and at the charge of their corresponding administrative budgets:- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;- Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe;- European Court of Human Rights;- Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe;- Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe;- Eurimages;- European Audiovisual Observatory;- Committees or other bodies of the Council of… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
United States, 919 F. [read post]
