Search for: "United States v. Robert Bates"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:13 am
The major job of the court is to keep the law of the United States more or less uniform. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am
” She added that “the fact is” that he “was an active and exceedingly dangerous enemy of the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
It is in this atmosphere that the idea of a national security court as a solution to the problem — an idea that for a long time existed only on the margins of the debate about U.S. counterterrorism policy but is now entertained by more mainstream thinkers such as Senator Diane Feinstein and a man I respect greatly, my former client Robert Gates – has gained momentum. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
In what was the most politically charged case since Bush v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
Bates was standard fare. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:40 am
In Bates v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:51 am
" Robert v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
H (2002) 1 FLR 1008 (United Kingdom -- Family Division -- 2002); see also Robertson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm
Mabus of the United States Navy, and Robert M. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
United States; Haro v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
United States; Haro v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
