Search for: "United States v. Robert Davis" Results 41 - 60 of 585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm by Danielle Citron
Twenty-four State Attorneys General signed an Amicus Brief in support of Arizona, as did the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:30 am by brian
The Court’s most recent federal Indian law decision, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:02 am
Kerry Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawJosé E. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a double jeopardy case, comes from Rory Little for this blog. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Justice Samuel Alito, along with several jurists from the United Kingdom visiting the United States as part of a legal exchange program, participated in a reenactment of a 1794 Supreme Court case, Georgia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States and Black v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
Maynard — and then suggested by the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  “Although the United States agrees with [Davis] that the question presented is an important and recurring one on which there is a conflict among the courts of appeals and state supreme courts, this case is not a good vehicle to resolve that question,” the Department argued. [read post]