Search for: "United States v. Segal" Results 41 - 60 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 7:20 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments on Thursday in the case of Al-Zahrani v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am by Alex R. McQuade
Benjamin Wittes outlined why Donald Trump is a national security threat to the United States of America. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:50 pm
And do not forget that the United States Constitution is more than two centuries old.But maybe Segal was merely being a bit sloppy here, using age as an imprecise proxy for irrelevance. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:21 am
"   Leahy Lashes Out at Citizens United Ruling "Continuing the Capitol Hill drumbeat against the Supreme Court that President Barack Obama started last night in his State of the Union address, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy this morning called the Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
The measure at issue is nearly identical to the ban in federal law struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:45 am by Matthew Bush
United States (2005).Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioner Segal v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
” In an op-ed at CNN, Eric Segall argues that there “are (at least) two fundamental changes that we need to make to the Supreme Court of the United States”:  oral arguments and opinion announcements at the Court should be televised, and the Constitution should be amended to give the Justices “fixed terms and a salary for life,” which will “provide[] much-needed judicial independence without the downsides of life tenure. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm by Viking
A pending petition in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm by Phil Cave
A pending petition in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am by Alex R. McQuade
Tamara Wittes argued that the United States cannot save Egypt from itself. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States (that’s Walter Nixon, not Richard), which explained why it would be in appropriate to allow other branches to define or interfere with the exercise of the legislative branch’s checks on the judiciary. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
Professor Segall, in his essay, claims that Professor Tribe's new book fails to advance the debate over whether the United States has an unwritten constitution. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Alternative Green Technologies, Inc., Mitchell Segal, Belmont Partners, LLC, Joseph Meuse, Howard Borg, David Ryan, Vikram Khanna, and Panascope Capital Inc.Case Number: 11-cv-09056 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case Filed: December 12, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 15, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-6 SEC v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Court will consider whether its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]