Search for: "United States v. Seymour" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 1:44 pm by Rumpole
 In the United States of America court proceedings are, with rare exceptions,  open to the public. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 4:30 am by Jeff Lorenzo
Seymour Recycling Corporation was, in its day, one of the most seriously contaminated Superfund sites in the United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:39 am by By Erik Lundegaard
On Nov. 5, 2001, eight weeks after that darkest of American days, the parties were assembled in Room 318 of the old courthouse conducting jury selection in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Obviously, in the wake of Citizens United and perhaps more significantly still for business, Sorrell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Suzanne Farmer, University of Mississippi  The Case of British Abolitionism: Seymour Drescher vs. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:49 am by Jason Rantanen
   * * * * The three appellants in this appeal, GPG, Trimone, and ELE, import ground fault circuit interrupters ("GFCIs") into the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) CAFC affirms ITC finding of no infringement: Pass & Seymour v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
Alliance Machine (Patently-O) CAFC affirms in Pass & Seymour appeal (2009-1338, -1369) (ITC Law Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False Claims Act does not bar multiple false marking suits: Simonian v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:12 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)   Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda)   Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46)   Russia Video… [read post]