Search for: "United States v. Shade"
Results 41 - 60
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2020, 9:56 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
Many – including the Solicitor General on behalf of the United States – had urged the Court to hear the Athena case. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
The Blaine Amendments found in most state constitutions, including Montana’s, resulted from Blaine’s failed attempt to amend the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm
When the union fell apart, Monasky took A.M.T., their two-month-old daughter, from Italy to the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:47 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] The assertion that juries, not judges, were uniformly responsible for sentencing at the time of the Founding, which assertion formed the foundation for blowing up the Guidelines and various state sentencing schemes, is flatly wrong as a historical matter. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States, Pam Karlan in Lozman v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 7:10 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:28 am
The United Kingdom. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union… [read post]
