Search for: "United States v. St. Hilaire"
Results 41 - 60
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The prosecutors allege, "The Defendant in rem is merchandise that has been introduced into the United States contrary to law, as it constitutes property unlawfully exported from Peru and stolen, smuggled or clandestinely imported or introduced into the United States." [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:37 am
The Government’s interpretation of [Egyptian patrimony] Law No. 215 and its application to the present case is inaccurate and, worse, absolutely counter to established United States case law. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
L. 311 (2013).CPIA import restrictions prohibit designated archaeological and ethnological objects from entering the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:00 am
St. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
” Foman v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:03 am
That continues to be the posture in the case United States of America v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:19 am
That is the refrain found in 23 paragraphs of answers filed by Sotheby's and Decia Ruspoli di Poggio Suasa in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 8:24 pm
Louis today told the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals that negotiations have failed in the case of United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
The present case differs from U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
The federal district court for the southern district of New York today allowed federal prosecutors to amend their forfeiture complaint in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 9:17 am
St. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
The United States has filed an amicus brief articulating OFAC's views regarding two aspects of this case. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:39 pm
Prosecutors in Brooklyn last week entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with defendant Joseph Lewis, II, completing the alleged antiquities trafficking case of United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 10:00 pm
It is the federal district court matter of United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3 and 3551 et seq.)" [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:48 pm
the property of Cambodia in exactly the same way that the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse is the property of the United States." [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Customs and Border Protection] need not demonstrate that the [Chinese and Cypriot] articles are restricted; rather, the [CPIA] statute 'expressly places the burden on importers to prove that they are importable.'"The case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
