Search for: "United States v. State of North Carolina" Results 41 - 60 of 2,888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
The plaintiff was an inmate at Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution in the Western District of North Carolina. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
We use this basic principle to explain some of the decisions from 1869 and 1870 from Louisiana and North Carolina in which state officials were deemed disqualified. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
Justice Edwin Reade of the North Carolina Supreme Court later explained, “[t]he idea [was] that one who had taken an oath to support the Constitution and violated it, ought to be excluded from taking it again. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:03 am by Dennis Crouch
Honeywell moved to transfer the case to the Western District of North Carolina under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  Perhaps one or more of the possible outcome-determinative “swing” states (e.g., Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) would omit his name, although even that is highly speculative, as it would depend upon questions of state-law authority and who controls the executive and judicial branches of the particular state. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
SFFA is the same group that sued Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, which led to the US Supreme Court effectively ending affirmative action. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 1:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina -- is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Decisions from Louisiana and North Carolina are consistent with Griffin's Case C. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm by Daniel Barry
‎ [6] The United States and each of the following 34 states as amicus curiae in support of Oklahoma: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas,… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am by Jacob Fishman
In Students for Fair Admissions, a non-employment case, a six-member majority ruled that the use of race in the admissions policies of the two defendants (Harvard and the University of North Carolina) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]