Search for: "United States v. Teed"
Results 41 - 60
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
The “it” in Giuliani’s explanation could also refer to pausing certain immigration temporarily, in order to assess whether the United States’ current criteria for screening immigrants actually work. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:56 pm
The most recent detailed discussion of this from a federal court is in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
The first case is United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:11 pm
One other circuit, the Fifth, has likewise held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right, but in that case, United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Weiss v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm
” The approach of the United States, arguing as amicus curiae, was a shade different. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:39 am
In Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm
She reasoned that banning males from a state nursing school was based on tired stereotypes, which set the stage for the later decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:51 am
The fact that Judge Cueto even took an interest in workers' compensation is beyond extraordinary.And knowing that the only resolution of such a conflicting issue is an appeal to the Third Circuit or directly to the FL Supreme Court is pure judicial chutzpah.The basis for Judge Cueto's ruling is that over the years the Florida workers' compensation act's original grant of benefits for permanent disability, which was part of the "Grand Bargain," has been so eroded as to… [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
