Search for: "United States v. The Commissioner" Results 41 - 60 of 3,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Constitutional Rights Constitutional rights refer to the rights bestowed upon everyone by the United States and Minnesota constitutions. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
(Editor’s Note: The statement below is collectively signed by 22 former United Nations Special Rapporteurs and former UN experts in the field of human rights on the situation in Rafah and the obligations of UN Member States.) [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
United States A new version of KOSA – the Kids Online Safety Act – has been introduced in the Senate. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
United States Taylor Swift is threatening legal action against the Florida college student who tracks the private jets of celebrities and public figures, including Swift. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The struggle is real. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has announced a campaign called “Think. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]