Search for: "United States v. Trinidad" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
On November 30th, the ACLU will be in the Supreme Court to argue a case that will decide the fate of thousands of people languishing in immigration prisons across the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Judgments scheduled to be handed down in the Privy Council are Lawrence v The Queen (Jamaica) and Piganiol v Smegh Ltee on Tuesday 11 February 2014; and Daniel v The State (Trinidad and Tobago) on Wednesday 12 February 2014. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 12:34 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKImmigration LawIllegal Re-Entry Indictment Dismissed; IJ's §212(c) Ruling, Underlying Deportation Violated Due Process United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKImmigration LawIllegal Re-Entry Indictment Dismissed; IJ's §212(c) Ruling, Underlying Deportation Violated Due Process United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55:  Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 6:23 am by Randy Barnhart
United States, 220 U.S. 523, 537, 31 S.Ct. 485, 488, 55 L.Ed. 570 (1911), quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
| Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz.Never too late 86 [week ending on Sunday 6 March] – Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41 | The IPKat team: news, new arrivals and farewells | CJEU in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM | World IP day | Advocate General's opinion in Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe in Austro-Mechana | EPO v trade union | OLG… [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 28 June 2016 the Privy Council will hand down judgment in the appeal of The United Policyholders Group & Ors v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad and Tobago) in Court 3 at 10.30am. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 25 January the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Ferguson v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago and other cases; Hallman Holding Ltd v Webster & Anor (Anguilla); and Williams v The Bermuda Hospitals Board (Bermuda). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
Pix Credit HERE  The United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday approved a nonbinding resolution condemning Russia for invading Ukraine and demanding that it withdraw its military forces. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm by Submitted Post
States of the United States do not have customs regulations and most states do not have to deal with international security issues in the course of interstate commerce. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
--> (Ancient Automobile Trinidad, Cuba 2015 Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)I am pleased to let those interested know that I have posted a draft of my essay, "The Human Rights Obligations of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:09 am by Earl Drott
Such cases tend to be very complex, procedurally speaking, especially when the vehicle or a part thereof was manufactured by a company outside the United States. [read post]