Search for: "United States v. Two Obscene Books"
Results 41 - 60
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
United States (1969), a landmark case in the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court of an obscenity conviction Hartstein v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court of an obscenity conviction Hartstein v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
So I’m sure other US-based UGC services clear the 50M MAU threshold (Minecraft and Roblox are two likely examples). [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
See Rowan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
The New War on ContraceptionThere was a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The Supreme Court of Canada, in a seven to two majority decision written by Justice Abella, affirmed the decisions below. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:14 pm
As the oldest federal court in the United States, it pre-dates by several weeks the organization of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (1984), this Court struck down a statutory provision that limited photographic reproductions of United States currency, but exempted reproductions “for philatelic, numismatic, educational, historical, or newsworthy purposes to content that was educational or newsworthy. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
United States, a case that asks what a “true threat” is. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Kingsley Books, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:34 am
The second set of cases (Moody v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
California (1959) ("For if the bookseller is criminally liable [for obscenity] without knowledge of the contents, and the [anti-obscenity] ordinance fulfills its purpose, he will tend to restrict the books he sells to those he has inspected; and thus the State will have imposed a restriction upon the distribution of constitutionally protected as well as obscene literature. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
The first of these two cases is Bantam Books v. [read post]
