Search for: "United States v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon"
Results 41 - 60
of 786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 3:24 pm
For example, the government prevailed in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:17 am
In Sykes v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:00 am
United States, (D OR, April 29, 2014), an Oregon federal district court allowed a pro se plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed, with leave to amend, his suit complaining that the Internal Revenue Service had denied Section 501(c)(3) status for a small church he had founded. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:18 am
Jun. 22, 2009), Judge King of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon granted Guidance Sales Corporation’s (“GSC”) motion to stay against GSC’s competitor, Biotronik, Inc (“Biotronik”). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:10 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued an amended ruling dismissing Ralls Corporation’s (“Ralls”) challenge to a presidential order requiring divestiture of its interest in four companies engaged in developing wind farms near a Naval base in Oregon. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
Index Newspapers v City of Portland, 3:20-cv-1035-SI, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has entered a temporary restraining order that blocks federal law enforcement officers from arresting or using physical force against journalists and legal observers as they respond to anti–police brutality protests there. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:28 am
FISA was designed to address the issues left open by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
United States Bureau of Reclamation. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:53 pm
United States, 536 U. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
United States District Judge David C. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:25 am
United States, granting the Trump Administration’s request for a stay pending its application for a writ of mandamus to the District of Oregon. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
The panel affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States Army Corps of Engineers in an action under the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act challenging the Corps' issuance of a permit as part of a project to mine valuable mineral sands near Coos Bay, Oregon. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:36 pm
Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau, Oregon Federal District Court Cause No. 3:11-cv-01493, Opinion and Order on Summary Judgment (February 4, 2013) (Dkt. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:09 am
The panel affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States Department of Commerce and others in an action brought by property owners under the Endangered Species Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, challenging the designation of critical habitat for a threatened species, the southern distinct population of green sturgeon, and the regulations implementing that designation. … [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:45 am
Brown et al – United States District Court – District of Oregon – April 19th, 2024) involves a class action against the State of Oregon and other officials at the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC). [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 8:17 am
The agreement still needs approval by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
