Search for: "United States v. Valentine" Results 41 - 60 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2019, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Sometime between August 31, 2018 and September 3, 2018, Mother moved with Son V to the United States. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:37 am by Steve Vladeck
Unlike in Valentine, Doe was picked up outside the United States (and in the context of armed conflict). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by Russ Bensing
Most of the talk about SCOTUS last week centered on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:52 am by Charles Sartain
United States of America, from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ExxonMobil learned the hard way that filing amended tax returns can be very costly. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:48 pm
The Valentines, jointly and severally, make a number of arguments based on United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ron Coleman
On Valentine’s Day, appropriately enough perhaps, Tiffany (the jeweler, not the singer) filed a complaint against Costco in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting a variety of trademark-related causes of action. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 1:31 pm by Mali Friedman
Judge Chen noted that he found the Leong decision by Judge Feess and the 2011 decision of Judge Henderson of the Northern District of California in Valentine v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:53 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:22 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUTCriminal Practice Tax Evasion, False Return Counts Improperly JoinedWith Counts Against Co-Defendant; Convictions Vacated United States v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman has this post discussing the recent Sixth Circuit Valentine opinion, a vehicle for the High Court to address Booker retroactivity issues; and this post discussing whether the Court should remand Claiborne given the United States Sentencing Committee's new Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy report. [read post]