Search for: "United States v. Williamson"
Results 41 - 60
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 1:25 pm
The most important issue the Court will consider is whether to overrule Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
II,§ 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
Williamson (“Williamson”), as trustee for the At Home Corporation Bondholders’ Liquidating Trust, owns U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:47 am
A 1985 precedent, Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
In Geier, but not in Williamson, the United States government had supported preemption on the ground that allowing the state-law claims would conflict with agency objectives. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:59 am
Mangiafico v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
In Knick, the Court will decide whether to overrule or limit Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
Court of Appeal (details required in resolution of necessity) United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land - 11th Circuit ("pretext" in compensation -- intent to depress valuation in anticipation of condemnation) Resource Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
United States; Plessy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:09 pm
United States: The big tax case before SCOTUS this year.] [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:21 am
” Williamson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
United States, 525 F.3d 1139 (Fed. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:39 pm
’” Upton, 466 U.S. at 734 (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:49 am
United States v. [read post]
