Search for: "Unknown Nicholls"
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Mesa 15-118Issue: (1) Whether a formalist or functionalist analysis governs the extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States; and (2) whether qualified immunity may be granted or denied based on facts - such as the victim’s legal status - unknown to the officer at the time of the incident. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Mesa 15-118Issue: (1) Whether a formalist or functionalist analysis governs the extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States; and (2) whether qualified immunity may be granted or denied based on facts - such as the victim's legal status - unknown to the officer at the time of the incident. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:16 pm
“There are still a lot of unknowns. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm
He notes, for example, that “Over the centuries, societies have declared many technologies to be dangerous, economically upsetting, immoral, unwise, or simply too unknown for our good. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
The judge referred to the passage in Lord Nicholls’ speech in Reynolds v Times Newspapers where, after having set out the essential test and illustrative guidelines (at page 205A-C), he ended his summary of the relevant principles (at page 205F) with these words (emphasis added): “Above all, the court should have particular regard to the importance of freedom of expression. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
This established the basis for a racialized slavery, hereby unknown to Africa or any region engaging in African slave trade. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
It seems to us that that is exactly the balance which Lord Nicholls was articulating in Reynolds…. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
This post examines a recent decision from the Appellate Court of Illinois – Second District: People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Gary Flood v The Times ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) has been portrayed as a blow to the Reynolds defence and to investigative journalism. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:31 am
Chairman Nichols noted that it may be beyond the scope of the Board’s job under A.B. 32 to dictate different forest practices from those developed by the state’s agencies charged with forest management. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:53 am
Michelle Nichols reports for Reuters. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 4:27 am
” Michelle Nichols reports for Reuters. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:28 am
Michelle Nichols reports for Reuters. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Akerman Senterfitt (-10% across the board) Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Alston & Bird (-5K across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Blank Rome (between 2% - 5% + 15K across the board )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Bryan Cave (10% across the board)Buchanan Ingersoll & Roone (5 to 10% across… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
” Michelle Nichols reports for Reuters. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Bryan Cave (10%% across the board)Chadbourne & Parke (Figures unknown)Davis Wright Tremaine (-10% across the board)Dorsey & Whitney (-10% across the board)DLA Piper (1st Years $145K to… [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:13 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Chadbourne & Parke (Figures unknown)Davis Wright Tremaine (-10% across the board)Gardere Winn (1st Years $160k to $145k + -$15K for 2nd years)Greenberg Traurig (-10% across the board)Hogan &… [read post]
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Chadbourne & Parke (Figures unknown)Davis Wright Tremaine (-10% across the board)DLA Piper (1st Years $145K to $130K)Gardere Wynne Sewell (1st Years $160k to $145k + -$15K for 2nd years)Greenberg… [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
In particular, the explanation at [4] of the way in which the rights protected by Articles 8 and 10 have been absorbed into the long-established action for breach of confidence was approved by Lord Nicholls in Campbell v. [read post]
