Search for: "Upon the Petition of Jane Doe 2" Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Cody M. Poplin
He also notifies the court that the defense has filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court regarding the denial of a writ of mandamus by the D.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am by Marty Lederman
 Or the Court could affirm the judgments before it, and then hold the government's petitions in the Eighth Circuit cases, Nos. 15-774, Burwell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, Orthomom faces a serious risk within her community if, as a result of Greenbaum's petition for discovery, she is identified as the author of these criticisms of wrongdoing within the community. [6] Doe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm by Law Lady
AVANTE AT LEESBURG, INC., a/k/a AVANTE AT LEESBURG OUTPATIENT REHAB., INC., AVANTE ANCILLARY SERVICES, INC., and AVANTE GROUP, INC., Appellees. 5th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Error to allocate parties' marital assets without accounting for decrease in value of husband's stock portfolio at time of final hearing -- Husband did not invite error by stipulating to amounts which were potentially subject to equitable distribution at time husband… [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
" The majority pointed out that although the Act does not conclusively resolve the issue, it is consistent with processing a 9(e)(1) petition supported by preagreement signatures. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:34 am by SHG
*The “victim” had been known as “Jane Doe” until she decided there was money to be made by publishing a book about her “experience. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 6:19 am by Russell Knight
But those penalties must be withdrawn immediately upon compliance of the violator. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As to the Basic presumption, the district court did not rely upon plaintiffs’ event study, which had been subject to substantial criticism by defendants’ expert. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Upon review of the trial court record, the Tenth Circuit held that the "Faragher/Ellerth" defense precluded vicarious liability against the State of Kansas for Judge Stewart’s alleged actions. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm by MOTP
The firm does not contend that there is general or specific personal jurisdiction over the Carrascos. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 10:01 am
  Similarly Section 2(3) of the NLRA provides that the term "employee" does not include "any individual employed by an employer subject to the Railway Labor Act. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:07 am by Hollis Kelly
The scandal has already led to the PM’s Liberal Party expelling Jody Wilson Raybould, the former Attorney General who made the original allegations of improper interference, and former treasury board president Jane Philpott. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
That opinion, previously ignored by some as an anomaly or even erroneous, was actually cited with approval by theSuperior Court in Pusl.The plaintiff in Pusl has since petitioned the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept an appeal and the defendant has filed an opposition to that petition. [read post]