Search for: "Use of Title "Judge" by a Practitioner"
Results 41 - 60
of 664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
The new paper titled “Professional Responsibility Considerations in AI for eDiscovery: Competence, Confidentiality, Privacy, and Ownership” was published by the EDRM in June 2023 and is beneficial as it provides comprehensive guidance on the ethical and professional responsibilities of legal practitioners when using AI for eDiscovery. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
It is composed of judges who have been appointed to the Board by the Secretary, HHS. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
” The judge’s actions reflect a broader trend of courts using their discretionary power to rein in so-called “nuclear” eight-figure jury verdicts, according to legal experts who spoke to Law360 . [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:27 pm
For those new DeSantis County Court judges, whose vocabulary is mostly limited to repeating over and over that they won't legislate from the bench and will follow the law (and won't say Gay), don't get too excited by the title of the post. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:22 am
While these provisions might seem rather generic, they clearly reveal Montenegro’s commitment to facilitate the application of the EAPO within its legal system and make it more familiar for national judges and practitioners that will have to deal with it. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:11 am
The present monograph, written in French, is by Boris Catzeflis and is titled “Les marques contraires à l’ordre public ou aux bonnes moeurs” ["Trade marks contrary to public order and morality"] (Schulthess, 2022, pp. 594).As its title suggests, the book covers the absolute ground of refusal in trade mark law for signs that are contrary to public order or morality. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
As such, it is of great relevance to practitioners interested in the evolution of this legal concept. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
The story WaPo tells is not just about an ambitious would-be judge. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
It made me think of a new opportunity: maybe one day we will have a “Judge Judy” show for the CCB claims! [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 12:26 pm
Tomorrow I will show how the presumption, amped too high, has caused judges and attorneys to overlook what was in plain sight—that the term "undue hardship" in Title VII is not one of ordinary meaning but is a legal term of art. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:36 am
Greg Lambert 5:45 So the name of the book is the legal singularity, which first of all, that’s pretty bold title, you know, thinking that title think thinking about law becoming self aware. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 5:51 am
Cooperation with the International Criminal Court on Investigation and Prosecution of Atrocities in Ukraine: Possibilities and Challenges,” which brought together leading practitioners and experts from around the country. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:43 am
In an opinion that should be required reading for any probate practitioner navigating homestead issues (which is all of us), the 3d DCA ruled in favor of surviving spouse. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm
She uses real cases to highlight how judges make difficult decisions, all the while facing outside pressures from the media, law enforcement, lobbyists, and the friends and families of the people involved. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Code § 16.004 is used unless the Plan establishes a different period. b. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:54 am
It can be one of the most impactful things a federal practitioner does and often carries a lot of weight with the judge. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:55 am
And I used to visit Houston and go to their facility for training and other purposes quite regularly. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:31 pm
To find out more, contact us online or at (833) 529-3476 to set up a free and confidential consultation today. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
MDI is used in spray foam insulation, but it also causes adverse human health effects, and, in particular, exacerbates asthma. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
In June 2021, an EEOC guidance document said that accidental misgendering (such as using the wrong pronouns or using a trans person’s former name — sometimes called “deadnaming” — as a result of a good-faith mistake) is not a Title VII violation, but incorrect pronoun use or other misgendering could violate the law if done intentionally and repeatedly. [read post]
