Search for: "VAN CONVERSIONS, INC."
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
North Carolina, a case I’ve been following closely — my students Jeremy Page, Mike Romeo and Sydney Sherman, and I filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the petition for Supreme Court review, filed on behalf of professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James… [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 6:54 pm
The plaintiff purchased Sprinter vans in the United States and exported them to Canada. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:31 am
United Health Programs of America, Inc. and Cost Containment Group Inc., No. 14-CV-03673 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
Conversely, a statute may impose a duty of care where one would not otherwise exist. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Appeals Agriculture: Farm Income Stabilization; Compensation Methods; Interpretation PrinciplesFerme Vi-Ber inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey 1993) (quoting Van Dusen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:46 am
” Doctor’s Data, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
But no one else ever held many thousands of lines of original, concededly (even Google's witnesses said so) highly creative material non-copyrightable.Yeah, there were some "fair use" cases such as the famous Sony and Sega decisions, which Circuit Judge O'Malley told Google's counsel (the same one as in this trial, Robert van Nest) to stop raising in connection with copyrightability because they had no bearing on it. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
Sarah Feingold, Etsy, Inc.: Free speech—we need the internet as it is, doing pretty well. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
On Tuesday, the latest decision from Mr Justice Arnold in American Science & Engineering Inc v Rapiscan Systems Limited [2016] EWHC 756 was handed down. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
Prescriptive and Jurisdictional Boundaries to the EU’s ‘Right to Be Forgotten’, Geert van Calster. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Such laws have traditionally covered unwanted phone calls, unwanted letters, unwanted attempts at face-to-face conversation and the like: again, speech to a particular person. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
FR Conversions Inc. is moving from Woodlawn into a 152,000 square-foot facility in Westminster this month. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
Carnes (Ark. 1973) (assistant dean of law school); Van Dyke v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
After all, it is videos like the one showing the horrific choking of Eric Garner that have spurred the national conversation around police brutality—making this a tempting proposition. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Jeremy writes of Les Laboratoires Servier & Another v Apotex Inc & Others [2014] UKSC 55, a UK Supreme Court decision that addresses a point of principle that is academically most interesting even though it doesn't crop up in court on a daily basis: does the defence of illegality bar a claim on a cross-undertaking in damages given by a patent owner in order to obtain an interim injunction where his UK patent is held to be invalid but his corresponding… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Google, Inc., 2014 WL 4364840 (Mass. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:20 am
Vans Skate Park, 187 N.J. 323, 342 (2006); Martindale v. [read post]
