Search for: "VARSITY BRANDS, INC."
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc., 137 S. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:16 pm
Webb is the president of Varsity Brands, Inc., an athletic equipment manufacturer that caters to cheerleading teams. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Breyer This remark was expounded at the Supreme Court earlier this month during a hearing in relation to Star Athletica L.L.C v Varsity Brands, Inc., et al.. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., 136 S. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:42 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:44 am
Which I sleep in wearing a rustic burnoose emblazoned with my varsity letter. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
"Varsity Brands, Inc., et al V Star Athletica, LLC. (14-5237)http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/08/19/copyright-case-asks-what-is-a-cheerleading-uniform/ [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:56 am
Bonus question: after Varsity Brands, are these watches protectable? [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 10:29 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., the Court ruled that a design element incorporated into clothing (or another useful article) is eligible for copyright protection if: the element can be perceived as a work of art separate from the useful article; and the element would qualify as a protectable pictorial, graphic or sculptural work if imagined separately from the article of clothing (or other useful article). [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., which held that a feature of a useful article is copyrightable if it can be perceived as a separately protectable work. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., a recent case in which the Court established a test for determining whether particular pictorial, graphic, or sculptural (“PGS”) elements of useful articles are “separable” from the article’s useful function, and thus copyrightable. [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:42 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. where the court will rule on the appropriate test to determine when a feature of a useful article is protectable under section 101 of the Copyright Act [text]. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:36 am
In Varsity Brands Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:48 am
Electronic Arts, Inc., Nos. 14-56266/14-56745 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
The Review Board drew on the test set out in Star Athletica LLC v Varsity Brands Inc (137 S. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of separability analysis, by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica precedent, the “separability… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of the separability analysis by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica precedent, the “separability… [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:50 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of the separability analysis by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica precedent, the “separability… [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
