Search for: "VERMONT v. NEW YORK" Results 41 - 60 of 755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
"  Secondly, he argued that under principles of comity, New York government agencies and courts should accord Vermont civil union partners recognition as spouses for purposes of applying New York law. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:32 pm by Joseph Lazzarotti
In this case (Doe v Guthrie Clinic, Ltd, March 25, 2013), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (covering New York, Connecticut and Vermont) is asking New York's highest court to determine whether the common law permits a medical corporation to be sued for a breach of the fiduciary duty of confidentiality concerning patient medical records when a non-physician employee makes an unauthorized disclosure of those records.… [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:16 am
This order was challenged in the courts on the ground that it was inconsistent with the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:11 am by Eric Lipman
Mark Hamblett has the story at the New York Law Journal, and here's a link to the opinion, Byrne v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:33 am by cornellvermontlaw
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the now famous case of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:48 pm
Court of Appeals in New York City (CCH Privacy Law in Marketing ¶60,558) holding that a Vermont statute regulating the collection and use of data identifying health care providers’ prescribing patterns impermissibly restricted commercial speech.The statute banned the sale, transmission or use of prescriber-identifiable data for marketing or promoting a prescription drug unless the prescriber gave consent.The appellate court determined that Vermont had… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am by Shari Shapiro
   Last week, the states of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Washington, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia filed notice of their intention to participate as amicus curiae  In June, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, West Virginia, Alaska, Nebraska, Ohio and Wyoming also filed an… [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:13 pm
 The United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appellate court for the districts located in New York, Vermont, and Connecticut) recently issued an en banc decision in Marcos Poventud v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:13 pm
 The United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appellate court for the districts located in New York, Vermont, and Connecticut) recently issued an en banc decision in Marcos Poventud v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:05 am by Salvatore Gangemi of Murtha Cullina LLP
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which covers Connecticut, New York and Vermont, upheld a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) finding that Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. [read post]