Search for: "VITAL v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
The society has a grounded interest to be informed about issues of vital importance. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
I also think that Congress has similar authority to address the problem in elections for state office, though I realize that this is a more contested view (including for reasons set out in Oregon v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:55 pm
With the decision of Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1994 case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the 1994 case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
103 (2017), University of Chicago Law School, citing Hans v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm
I don't know whether the allegations are sound, but the lawsuit certainly bears watching.The post Battle of the Tech Titans, <i>Musk v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm
SE v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Lochner v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:45 pm
The common law of constitutional conventions is a vital resource for this task. [read post]
