Search for: "Van Royal v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
L. 1-57 (2011).EMISSIONS TRADING.Fox, Jessica, Royal C. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
Protecito0n form unlawful interference states the obvious--and it adds little to the duty of states to force them to declare that they will do what they are constitutionally burdened with doing. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
Van Ness, Charles K. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
I n September 2019, in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales, the High Court ruled that the use of FRT by South Wales Police was, in those specific instances, lawful (the case was brought by Ed Bridges, a member of the public, who believed his image had been captured on FRT from a police van whilst he was shopping in Cardiff city centre). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
To explain: last week Prince Harry (real forenames Henry Charles Albert David; when you're royal enough or as famous as Madonna, you don't need a surname) was caught by camera wearing nothing but his royal skin, a wristwatch and a necklace (see Katpost here). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:40 pm
In Van Zant v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm
: Animal Welfare Beats Freedom of Religion: yet another critical comment on the ECtHR’s judgment in Executief van de Moslims van België et al. v Belgium. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
Shinawatra had returned to Thailand from exile after being overthrown in a coup and recently received a royal pardon in relation to a prison sentence he was serving for corruption offences. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Brendan Van Alsenoy and Marieke Koekkoek, SSRN. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
It held that, applying the new framework set out in Van Breda v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
Van der Peet, the Supreme Court of Canada drew on American jurisprudence and stated in 1996, 34. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
Thanks are due to the IPKat's friend Marlou L.J. van de Braak (Hoyng Monegier) for telling him all about the General Court's ruling last week in Case T-426/09 Bayerische Asphaltmischwerke v OHIM, Royal BAM, 26 October 2011, on a Community trade mark opposition involving two figurative marks each of which contained the word 'BAM'. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Rhode Island similarly operated under its 1663 Royal Charter until it adopted a constitution in 1842. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:43 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum decision of the U.S. [read post]
