Search for: "Van Royal v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
With the ban on the breeding of captive cetaceans, these are just a few of the studies which will no longer be possible: Vergara, V., Barrett-Lennard, L.G. 2008. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am by INFORRM
The witnesses stated that they were unexpectedly touched by PVDD in a sexually suggestive manner, which felt like sexual intimidation. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Brendan Van Alsenoy and Marieke Koekkoek, SSRN. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
Chief Justice Lamer has stated extra-judicially that “[t]he Charter can be understood to give effect to Canada’s international legal obligations, and should therefore be interpreted in a way that conforms to those obligations. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:49 am by Isobel Williams
But back to Durkin v DSG Retail Ltd and HFC Bank Plc. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
 To explain: last week Prince Harry (real forenames Henry Charles Albert David; when you're royal enough or as famous as Madonna, you don't need a surname) was caught by camera wearing nothing but his royal skin, a wristwatch and a necklace (see Katpost here). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
It was a busy media law week at the Royal Courts of Justice, with the seventh week of the Leveson Inquiry and the settlement of 37 phone hacking cases against News International. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  To date, nearly all of the litigation that van ‘t Groenewout has been involved in has been brought in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Rhode Island similarly operated under its 1663 Royal Charter until it adopted a constitution in 1842. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
Thanks are due to the IPKat's friend Marlou L.J. van de Braak (Hoyng Monegier) for telling him all about the General Court's ruling last week in Case T-426/09 Bayerische Asphaltmischwerke v OHIM, Royal BAM, 26 October 2011, on a Community trade mark opposition involving two figurative marks each of which contained the word 'BAM'. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:43 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum decision of the U.S. [read post]