Search for: "Various Items of Personal Property v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
PROPERTY - HOMEOWNERS - PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM FROM POST-FIRE REMEDIATION WORK - MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY - FRYE HEARINGO'Brien v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am by centerforartlaw
It also highlights and partially explores the difference in the United States and Australian copyright laws with a few case studies of legal issues surrounding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artworks in Australia. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
L’Oréal has identified various forms of infringement, including, inter alia, the sale and offer for sale, to consumers in the EU, of goods bearing L’Oréal’s trade marks intended, by L’Oréal, for sale in third States (parallel importation).The High Court (United Kingdom), before which the dispute is pending, has asked the Court of Justice a number of questions concerning the obligations to which a company operating an internet… [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
SB 408 is a sweeping piece of legislation that proposes various changes to Florida’s property insurance laws. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Based on Schomp's complaint, Enjaian claims police unreasonably searched his apartment and seized various items in violation of his rights under the 4th Amendment. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:45 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorneys representing “commercial paleontologist” Eric Prokopi filed a motion to dismiss last Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Claims for conversion required that a party had title to sue, an unconditional demand for the goods or item’s return had been made, and such request had been refused or delivery of the item had failed. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am by Florian Mueller
And I would be – I mean, I would be surprised if, in their obligations in the United States they haven't made that disclosure.There's definitely some pressure on Samsung down under and it has to answer some questions now. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is authorized by federal law (39 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]